College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Porn for Bibles

Atheist Agenda exchanges pornography for religious texts through March 3 in Sombrilla

paisanonews@sbcglobal.net

Published: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, March 3, 2010

SMUT

Joseph Tidline/ The Paisano

Some members of the UTSA community gathered in opposition to Atheist Agenda; many more members were merely observers.

Playboy, Penthouse and other adult magazines were exchanged for Bibles, Torahs, Korans, and other religious texts at the annual Smut for Smut event hosted by the UTSA Atheist Agenda on March 1.


A screaming, singing throng of UTSA students circled around the steps running from the JPL to the MS, anchored to a small booth offering the strange trade as opponents of the Atheist Agenda’s methods gathered in protest.


Atheist Agenda President Carlos Morales said that although pornography is a symbol of misogyny, the bible, too, advocates the mistreatment of women. 


Defending the Agenda against accusations of amorality, Morales said, “If they’re defining morality by what it says in the bible, then it’s okay to stone your children; it’s okay to tell women they can’t talk outside the church.  I wouldn’t want to live by what they call ‘morality’ in the bible.”


By mid-afternoon, the Atheist Agenda had collected approximately 10 texts.


“People that come over here are worried that they’re going to get harassed.  We got all of those in the first 30 minutes, then after [the protest] started people were hesitant,” Morales said.


Early in the afternoon, a crowd of Christian protestors formed denouncing the Smut for Smut campaign.  One of the earliest arrivals and most outspoken members of the crowd was St. Mary’s University student Adam Zepada who, for much of the afternoon, danced while wearing a bandana over his face while paraphrasing scripture.


“I saw it on the news on Friday.  I came out on Saturday, but they weren’t out here,” Zepada said.  “I wanted to call up some homeboys and be like ‘hey dawg, I wanna go up there and take care of it real quick.’  But, because I’m saved and I gave my life to Christ in 2007, I don’t live like that anymore.” 


Others among the counter-protestors were less adamant, including Cecilia Tapia, a sophomore psychology major at UTSA.  Standing among the crowd, she held up a red copy of the New American Standard version of the bible, which she had no intention of trading in for porn.


“I’m here to make sure they know the word of God,” Tapia said.  She added that she believes she was there for both herself and the atheists in the crowd. 


“It’s part of my belief; Jesus teaches us that if we do not preach the word of God when someone has entered into our lives, then it’s our fault if he doesn’t enter into heaven because it’s our job as Christians to preach out to everybody else.”


Signs carried above the crowd included messages such as “Jesus Saves” and “Jesus loves the Atheist Agenda,” as well as more simple ones that consisted of nothing more than a penciled peace sign on a scrap of notebook paper.  Others began singing hymns, including “Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so.”


Through the growing wind and threats of rain, the two groups grew larger into the afternoon, and police began maintaining a safety buffer between the two groups.  Inside this no-man’s-land, a third party began to form, composed of proclaimed agnostics asking for peace.


“Well, we don’t really believe in either side.  We believe both foster hate,” UTSA junior Victoria Arzu said.  “They know they’re doing it for show, and they know that either party could be mistaken in their beliefs.  We choose an agnostic position because it’s the smartest thing to do.”


“(The Atheist Agenda) is just trying to offend people, (the counter-protesters) are just fighting back,” UTSA student Connor Rehberg said.  “It’s just been going on forever.”


Among the agnostics, sophomore Nathalie Tenorio said, “This is absolutely ridiculous.  These people have their religious beliefs and that’s fine and everything, and these people have their beliefs as well, but there’s no reason they should be going after each other.”


The crowd was formed: Atheists at the stairs, protestors across the way, and agnostics seated peacefully in the middle. 


“You could call it a middle ground,” Tenorio said, “but it’s more of a ground of peace and silence.  It’s a ground of love instead of the hate they’re both fostering.”


Michelle Brossart was offended not by the Atheists' view but by what she saw as their obvious intentions.


“They admitted it’s a publicity stunt.  They want to evoke crazy emotions out of people because they want to make their agenda known,” Brossart, a pre-Dental hygiene major, said.  “But only very, very few people are actually gaining anything from this.” 


Morales said the Bible is problematic.


“It’s an ancient text that condones violence, genocide, misogyny towards women and is almost completely fictional.  The Jews were never held by the Egyptians; Noah’s ark never happened.  All these things are completely fictional.”


At 3:40 pm, the divided crowd came together on the stairs between the Sombrilla and MS for an open debate between Morales and Kyle Volkmer, one of the Christian protestors.  The debate remained civil despite the tension that had been growing throughout the afternoon.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Gonzo Smothermon
Fri Mar 5 2010 08:53
This is actually very typical for the times we are going through. We were given free will by God when he created us and we make the decisions that will eventually form us and send us down the road chosen.
I would not want to be on the other end of the conversation whilst standing before the great I Am but that is my choice. I pray that those which have chosen this path have thought about their souls because hell awaits the souls not saved. And hell is very real, by the way. It is sad everyone believes in Satan but seem to have so much trouble with God.
Ryan Hurst you said, " I agree with what the Atheist Agenda was saying, the Bible isn't all Jesus loves you and smiley faces."
I would never agree with anything an atheist says but the Bible (which contains the Torah) is about Law and Grace. We were under Law before Jesus and Grace after he died for our sins.
The Bible leads us up to that point and follows after it but contains many excerpts which are bloody and full of death. David was told by God himself he would not build his Temple because of the amount of blood he had shed.
With that being said the final call is the "smile" we are all looking for in the end.
I will say, at least the atheists have made a stand (a horrible, but not irreversible choice).
This is unlike the agnostic for whom God has spoken of, as well as, the atheist. Revelation 3:16 So, because you are lukewarm--neither hot nor cold--I am about to spit you out of my mouth.
It doesn't have to be this way but there is that free will thing again.
This is about so much more than trading the Bible for some dime store sex mag. It is about the loss of souls to Lucifer; and if your soul is with him, I can assure you that he will exact payment for you sleeping in his bed.
Ryan Hurst
Wed Mar 3 2010 23:18
I question why this event was held. Don't get me wrong, I agree with what the Atheist Agenda was saying, the Bible isn't all Jesus loves you and smiley faces. But to create an event that really did nothing but entrench both sides against one another doesn't seem all that constructive. I can pretty confidently say that neither side won any 'converts'.

I wonder if the event would have gone over better if they tweeked it, like perhaps a "fiction for fiction" campaign that other colleges have started doing recently. The only reason porn was selected (from what I can tell) was for shock value and getting attention (international it seems), and while it did open up discussion, most of it was not all that constructive.

I'm not saying the event shouldn't have been held however, it was a great example of freedom of speech in action. But if Atheists and Agnostics (yes, I include them together) want to explain their reasoning an open up discussion, we should do so with our best foot forward. Not by being antagonistic (even if you feel the other side 'deserves' it).

On a totally un-related note: why did neither this article, or any of the debates (that I saw) mention any of the other thousand of religions? They let you trade in Korans, Torah's, and Book of Mormons as well. Why does it always have to be Christian vs. Atheists? Maybe I want to know what Muslims thought about it?

Noah Tritz
Wed Mar 3 2010 22:24
CORRECTION to the comment below: By FAILING TO SPEAK out against the process by which this group has chosen to deliver their message, UTSA has missed an amazing opportunity to highlight these accomplishments. I worked very hard on the baseball field and in the classroom as a Roadrunner and I deserve better representation for what I and the majority of the UTSA students, faculty, and alumni have accomplished.
Noah Tritz
Wed Mar 3 2010 22:14
There is more to this campaign than simply the argument of Christianity vs. Atheism. As a recent UTSA graduate and former student athlete, I am appalled and embarrassed that a significant minority among the UTSA community is allowed to paint a national image so detrimental to the University. UTSA does not have the national notoriety of UT Austin or Texas A&M outside of the state of Texas. UTSA was recently recognized by the Air Force as having the #1 Air Force ROTC program in the country. Our MBA program was recently ranked the #1 MBA program for Hispanics in the country. UTSA was recognized by the Department of Defense as one of the top Internet Cyber Security institutions in the country. How many of these accolades have been discussed in the national media this week? NONE OF THEM! I understand that the university may have their hands tied as far as preventing this campaign from taking place, and I certainly acknowledge this group's right to free speech. I do believe, however, that the hierarchy of UTSA, particularly President Romo, have missed a tremendous opportunity to highlight the numerous achievements the university has accomplished over the past couple years. By speaking out against the process by which this group has chosen to deliver their message, UTSA has missed an amazing opportunity to highlight these accomplishments. I worked very hard on the baseball field and in the classroom as a Roadrunner and I deserve better representation for what I and the majority of the UTSA students, faculty, and alumni have accomplished.
Michael McGruder
Wed Mar 3 2010 00:33
While I am all for freedom of speech, the Atheist Agenda is just fostering an environment of hatred by holding this event.

On a related note, isn't this considered harassment calling the Bible (and other religious texts) smut? Pursuant to section 9.01 III. B. of the student handbook :

"Harassment, as a form of discrimination, is defined as verbal or physical conduct that is directed at an individual or group because of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, citizenship, veteran status or sexual orientation when such conduct is sufficiently severe, pervasive or persistent so as to have the purpose or effect of interfering with an individual's or group's academic or work performance; or of creating a hostile academic or work environment."

On a completely different note, I do not believe pornography is actually ALLOWED on campus. Pursuant to section 9.01 III. E. 4 of the student handbook, "Exposure to sexually oriented graffiti, pictures, posters, or materials" is considered sexual harassment.

I don't see how this is allowed to continue.

timothy clark
Tue Mar 2 2010 05:53
this article is so biased. agnostics are peaceful? please...i talked with a few agnostics who were just as opinionated. you should rewrite this without the generalizations. just cause atheists and religion are one opposite sides of the board, that doesn't mean agnostics are in the middle. thank you for covering our event but i feel this ad was very biased.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In